Análise comparativa entre a mudança de fundações nos métodos construtivos steel frame e convencional

Abstract

The present work aims to carry out a comparative analysis between changing foundations in Light Steel Frame and Conventional construction methods. The research sought to evaluate the differences and similarities between the two methods in relation to changing foundations, considering factors such as cost, execution time, safety and sustainability . The analysis was carried out through a literature review and a case study of a project that was proven with both construction methods. The results showed that the Light Steel Frame method has advantages over the conventional method, such as reduced execution time and cost, as well as greater flexibility and adaptation to terrain conditions. However, the conventional method is still widely used due to its familiarity and low initial cost. The research also highlighted the importance of choosing the appropriate construction method for each project, considering the specific terrain conditions and the client’s needs.